<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange 2007 Database Clustering and High Availability Features&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/</link>
	<description>&#124; The Ramblings of an Exchange Admin &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: agedmcse</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>agedmcse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-3371</guid>
		<description>Excellent article which has greatly assisted me in writing up proposal for clustering Exchange at our company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article which has greatly assisted me in writing up proposal for clustering Exchange at our company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajkumar</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajkumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the detailed Explanation on HA Solutions on Exchange Server</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the detailed Explanation on HA Solutions on Exchange Server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Computer &#187; Exchange 2007 Resources</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2937</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Computer &#187; Exchange 2007 Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2937</guid>
		<description>[...] http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability.." rel="nofollow">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2936</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2936</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I am currently writing a whit paper on Exchange clustering and this article has helped a great deal-thankyou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I am currently writing a whit paper on Exchange clustering and this article has helped a great deal-thankyou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hinkle</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation of all of this.  I am trying to do a 2008 CCR cluster to get ready for an exchange 2007 installation.  Is there an article written that shows the steps to setup MNS?  When I go to the quorum config sceen and choose node majority, it was already defaulted to that, and says it doesn&#039;t see any disks even though both nodes have a d:\ of 500 gigs.  Am I doing something wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation of all of this.  I am trying to do a 2008 CCR cluster to get ready for an exchange 2007 installation.  Is there an article written that shows the steps to setup MNS?  When I go to the quorum config sceen and choose node majority, it was already defaulted to that, and says it doesn&#8217;t see any disks even though both nodes have a d:\ of 500 gigs.  Am I doing something wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dach</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>Dach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>Thank you!!! You saved me from the long and boring technet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!!! You saved me from the long and boring technet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamara</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2935</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2935</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much. This is well explained and your efforts are appreciated.

Tamara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much. This is well explained and your efforts are appreciated.</p>
<p>Tamara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phr3@k</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2932</link>
		<dc:creator>phr3@k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2932</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant SCC*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant SCC*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phr3@k</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>phr3@k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on &gt;2node SCR? Should we try to keep a 1:1 A:P ratio? I can have as much a 7:1 . Is the one passive able to act as a failover for all the actives?  Even though they contain different data stores?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on &gt;2node SCR? Should we try to keep a 1:1 A:P ratio? I can have as much a 7:1 . Is the one passive able to act as a failover for all the actives?  Even though they contain different data stores?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Grogan</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Grogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>Hiya, the main difference between the Clustering model used by Exchange 2003 Active / Passive is that each node needed to be in the same data centre (due to the shared storage aspect) - you could replicate your cluster to another Data Centre, however this would need to be accomplished using third party software and additional hardware.



Exchange 2007 CCR clustering operates on the principle that each node has its own storage, and the log files are replicated between the master and secondary node via a wan link - where they are replayed into the secondary nodes database.

The cluster itself in CCR is configured as a MNS where, again a copy of the Quorum database is stored on each node and updated via the WAN.



Cheers



A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya, the main difference between the Clustering model used by Exchange 2003 Active / Passive is that each node needed to be in the same data centre (due to the shared storage aspect) &#8211; you could replicate your cluster to another Data Centre, however this would need to be accomplished using third party software and additional hardware.</p>
<p>Exchange 2007 CCR clustering operates on the principle that each node has its own storage, and the log files are replicated between the master and secondary node via a wan link &#8211; where they are replayed into the secondary nodes database.</p>
<p>The cluster itself in CCR is configured as a MNS where, again a copy of the Quorum database is stored on each node and updated via the WAN.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Very good representation.
I&#039;m a little confused though, could you explain what the differences is between having a normal say Exchange 2003 Cluster (2 Node) and then having the added feature of CCR?

Exchange Cluster can be already split into two seperate data centres?

Confused here.

Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Very good representation.<br />
I&#8217;m a little confused though, could you explain what the differences is between having a normal say Exchange 2003 Cluster (2 Node) and then having the added feature of CCR?</p>
<p>Exchange Cluster can be already split into two seperate data centres?</p>
<p>Confused here.</p>
<p>Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilhamj</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2928</link>
		<dc:creator>gilhamj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2928</guid>
		<description>Great article...do you know if the remote SCR node can have all Exchange roles installed (CAS, and HUB) on the server, or does SCR limit that remote server to a Mailbox role only like other cluster topologies?

Ideally, I would like to require only on server for exchange redundancy at the DR remote site.  At the primary site, we have a SCC cluster, and additional servers as the CAS/HUB role.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article&#8230;do you know if the remote SCR node can have all Exchange roles installed (CAS, and HUB) on the server, or does SCR limit that remote server to a Mailbox role only like other cluster topologies?</p>
<p>Ideally, I would like to require only on server for exchange redundancy at the DR remote site.  At the primary site, we have a SCC cluster, and additional servers as the CAS/HUB role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>Very detail explanation of different scenarios. thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very detail explanation of different scenarios. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njnoypi01</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2927</link>
		<dc:creator>njnoypi01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2927</guid>
		<description>This is a great stuff, I learned a lot in reading your article.

Please keep it coming.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great stuff, I learned a lot in reading your article.</p>
<p>Please keep it coming.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocserver</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>ocserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>Great article for an excellent overview of the High Availabillity for Exchange 2007 Organizations. I especially love the diagrams. It makes it really easy to grasp the concepts.

Super as always Andy. Maaan you´re good. :-)

Best Wishes / Jesper Bernle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article for an excellent overview of the High Availabillity for Exchange 2007 Organizations. I especially love the diagrams. It makes it really easy to grasp the concepts.</p>
<p>Super as always Andy. Maaan you´re good. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Best Wishes / Jesper Bernle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/exchange-2007-database-clustering-and-high-availability-features/#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andy,
Very good summary covering the different availability options in Exchange 2007. Will definitely come back to see your Exch 2003 to 2007 scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy,<br />
Very good summary covering the different availability options in Exchange 2007. Will definitely come back to see your Exch 2003 to 2007 scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
