<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange 2003 &#8211; Spam Attack Internal &amp; External &#8211; Part 1&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/</link>
	<description>&#124; The Ramblings of an Exchange Admin &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gastonpuentes</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>gastonpuentes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>first at all, sorry for my bad inglish. but i really need some help.
i`ve Exchange 2003 SP2,
 how can i avoid to recive mail from my own domain, i cant restrict the smtp, i closed smtp to send to external domain, but i still reciving mail (spam) from my domain.

I`w really apreciate some help.
Thanks, Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first at all, sorry for my bad inglish. but i really need some help.<br />
i`ve Exchange 2003 SP2,<br />
 how can i avoid to recive mail from my own domain, i cant restrict the smtp, i closed smtp to send to external domain, but i still reciving mail (spam) from my domain.</p>
<p>I`w really apreciate some help.<br />
Thanks, Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exchange 2003 - Spam Attack Internal &#38; External - Part 3 (SPAM)&#8230; &#171; telnet 127.0.0.1 25</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>Exchange 2003 - Spam Attack Internal &#38; External - Part 3 (SPAM)&#8230; &#171; telnet 127.0.0.1 25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>[...] &amp; External - Part 3&#160;(SPAM)&#8230;    In my previous two articles on this subject (located here and here) I discussed how it is important to be aware of both internal and external attacks against [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp; External &#8211; Part 3&nbsp;(SPAM)&#8230;    In my previous two articles on this subject (located here and here) I discussed how it is important to be aware of both internal and external attacks against [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exchange 2003 - Spam Attack Internal &#38; External - Part 2 (Open Relay)… &#171; telnet 127.0.0.1 25</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>Exchange 2003 - Spam Attack Internal &#38; External - Part 2 (Open Relay)… &#171; telnet 127.0.0.1 25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>[...] External - Part 2 (Open&#160;Relay)…    In the last article on this subject (which is located here) I shared with you some thoughts that I had about how the structure of your Exchange environment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] External &#8211; Part 2 (Open&nbsp;Relay)…    In the last article on this subject (which is located here) I shared with you some thoughts that I had about how the structure of your Exchange environment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Grogan</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2905</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Grogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2905</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really good point, I did say in the article that the three examples given would have variations in between, however, you are totally correct that a securer and cheap option is the stick a &#039;nix box in the way.
Thanks for posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really good point, I did say in the article that the three examples given would have variations in between, however, you are totally correct that a securer and cheap option is the stick a &#8216;nix box in the way.<br />
Thanks for posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telnetport25.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/exchange-2003-spam-attack-internal-external-part-1/#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s the 4th scenario for small organizations: poping mailbox content with POP3 connector. This works very well if you don&#039;t have more than 20-30 mailboxes (depending of the POP3 connector, you can get performance for up to 100 mailboxes) and you.

Microsoft don&#039;t like this one because they want to sell multiple products to the same client (Exchange Edge, ISA, Forefront and so on).

Another really cheap solution consist to put a stronly hardened Nix box mailgateway (i.e. FreeBSD + Qmail or Postfix + Kaspersky AV/Antispam) in front of Exchange server and SPAM will be the word that you will never hear again. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s the 4th scenario for small organizations: poping mailbox content with POP3 connector. This works very well if you don&#8217;t have more than 20-30 mailboxes (depending of the POP3 connector, you can get performance for up to 100 mailboxes) and you.</p>
<p>Microsoft don&#8217;t like this one because they want to sell multiple products to the same client (Exchange Edge, ISA, Forefront and so on).</p>
<p>Another really cheap solution consist to put a stronly hardened Nix box mailgateway (i.e. FreeBSD + Qmail or Postfix + Kaspersky AV/Antispam) in front of Exchange server and SPAM will be the word that you will never hear again. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
